|
Key
This line was removed.
This word was removed. This word was added.
This line was added.
|
Changes (19)
View page history... |
| {tip} {quote} |
| * [Shanti Subramanyam: [Cool Stack 1.3 Is Here|http://blogs.sun.com/shanti/entry/cool_stack_1_3_is] |
| * [Jenny Chen: [MySQL Innodb Performance Tuning For Disk-Bound Workloads On CMT Servers|http://blogs.sun.com/luojiach/entry/mysql_innodb_performance_tuning_for] |
| * Neelakanth Nadgir: [Maximizing Sysbench OLTP performance for MySQL Sysbench|http://blogs.sun.com/realneel/entry/tuning_mysql_innodb_for_sysbench] |
| * [Chhandomay Mandal: [Multi-socket CMT servers running wild|http://blogs.sun.com/chhandomay/entry/multi_socket_cmt_servers_running] |
| * [SPECjAppServer2004 World Record: [Single Application Server on Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240|http://blogs.sun.com/bmseer/entry/specjappserver2004_world_record_single_application1] |
| * [Allan Packer: [Sun's CMT Goes Multi-chip|http://blogs.sun.com/allanp/entry/sun_s_cmt_goes_multi] |
| * [Alan Chiu: [10 Gigabit Ethernet on UltraSPARC T2 Plus|http://blogs.sun.com/puresee/entry/10gbe_performance_on_t5140_t5240] |
| * [Scott Davenport: FMA features of Maramba|http://blogs.sun.com/sdaven/fma_for_t2plus] |
| * [Steve Sistare: [Solaris Scalability, including MPO, scheduling, mutexes & locks, the clock thread |http://blogs.sun.com/sistare/entry/scaling_solaris_on_large_cmt] |
| * [Brian Whitney: [Maramba STREAM results|http://blogs.sun.com/whitneyb/entry/stream_benchmark_results_on_sun] |
| * [Tim Cook: [What drove processor design toward CMT?|http://blogs.sun.com/timc/entry/what_drove_processor_design_toward] |
| * [Giri Mandalika: [Running Batch Workloads on Sun's CMT Servers|http://blogs.sun.com/mandalika/entry/running_batch_workloads_on_sun] |
| * [Satish Vanga: [SugarCRM and MySQL |http://blogs.sun.com/vanga/entry/scaling_sugarcrm_with_mysql_on] |
| * [Jignesh Shah: [PostgreSQL 8.2.4 Scaling on Sun Fire T2000 with Solaris 10|http://blogs.sun.com/jkshah/entry/postgresql_8_2_4_scaling] |
| * [Sun's even faster SPECweb2005: [New Record Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 UltraSPARC T2|http://blogs.sun.com/bmseer/entry/sun_s_even_faster_specweb2005] |
| * [Allan Packer: [CMT Comes of Age|http://blogs.sun.com/allanp/entry/cmt_comes_of_age] |
| * [Richard McDougall: [Welcome to the CMT Era|http://blogs.sun.com/rmc/entry/welcome_to_the_cmt_era] |
| * [16-core Intel System vs. Niagara-2 - Milek's Blog, 3/5|http://milek.blogspot.com/2008/03/16-core-intel-system-vs-niagara-2.html] |
| * Robert Milek: [16-core Intel System vs. Niagara|http://milek.blogspot.com/2008/03/16-core-intel-system-vs-niagara-2.html] |
| ** Robert Milkowski runs several sysbench tests, and includes different graphs displaying various test results. In terms of the CPU and threads tests, he finds that the Niagara-2 and the 16-core Intel box deliver about the same performance with 32 threads, but Niagara runs quicker when using more threads. Robert concludes by stating that the Niagara-2 box can rival 4-CPU 4-core Intel boxes if the application can utilize all of these cores. {quote} |
... |