3/19 10:30 NWAM design summit finish
2 - IPv6 NCUs should always be enabled
13 - can we torch network-service?
maybe short circuit net-svc in first case when nwam enabled?
ifconfig -AUd4 is hack at best anyways (netmasks, dns)
so deal with it in NWAM
but need to make ipqos code its own service - talk to ML
phase 0 bug - defer and note that you can restart NWAM
could we do that by making net/service <- net/physical:default
but that fails due to dependencies on net/service
so can we create net/service:{default,nwam}
does that poliferate?
14 - iptun <- dependent on network/physical:default since it is old world
-- need to talk to seb
3 - have automatic vs user ncp, bimodal switch
can it be merely default behavior - alan (agree mph)
renee - maybe node ncp but mode
no ncp => automatic mode
if somebody sets variable and there isn't any config then the
template config is written out
the smf variable always tells us what to do
when we install ncp then we set the variable to true but the
user can reset to false which then says ignore ncp
this gets complex in switching back and forth so instead go into
maintenace mode
can we create customized error codes?
if user create ncp then turn off but then can be controlled
independently
1 - activation
since we have knowledge of over then you can't point at vanity
name and then later point vanity name at another link
by skipping network/physical:default are we missing vanity names
two rename cases
- changing label
- applying old name (dr'd) to new interface
cfgadm/rcm has seperate policy management parts
rename - can't rename to current thing or from remove thing
(dead bodies are frozen)
dr framework more tied to boot infrastructure (hostname files, etc.)
future - remove active part of dr in future, but now need a way to
get dr out of the way when nwam is active
how does NWAM restore its view of the work wrt link rename
- problably linkid
nwam and dr can't cross paths? too strong?
in any case need way to have rcm not act on events
sysevents for new vlans etc is caused by rcm so if we do this
then who is responsible for causing those sysevents
common code in libdladm
email to david about what he has done in this area
1G